Anton Polikarpov | Vladyslav Zhuravlov | 17 December, 2024

Legal protection of a medicinal product for AstraZeneca

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals & Fitness

Client: AstraZeneca AB

Defendants:

  1. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited
  2. Ministry of Health of Ukraine

Case Overview

AstraZeneca AB, the owner of Ukrainian Patent No. 77306 for the invention “C-aryl glucoside SGLT2 inhibitors and their method of use”, filed a lawsuit against Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. The case arose due to the successful registration and potential market entry of the drug “Dapaglin”, which contains dapagliflozin, an active substance identical to the one protected by the patent. AstraZeneca claimed that this violated its exclusive intellectual property rights.

The Ministry of Health issued Order No. 498 on March 16, 2023, approving the registration of “Dapaglin”. AstraZeneca initiated the protection of its intellectual property rights, requesting:

  • To prohibit Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited from using the patented invention in the drug “Dapaglin”.
  • To declare the Ministry of Health’s order on the registration of the drug “Dapaglin” invalid.

Client’s Objectives

  • To stop the infringement of its intellectual property rights by prohibiting the use of the patented invention in the drug “Dapaglin”.
  • To annul the Ministry of Health’s order on the registration of the drug “Dapaglin” and revoke its authorization for sale in Ukraine.

Case Complexity

  • Scientific and legal complexity: The case required thorough scientific analysis and the preparation of multiple expert opinions to confirm the patent violation.
  • Procedural delays: The proceedings were delayed due to the absence of representatives of the defendants at court hearings and the complexity of evidence collection.
  • Regulatory aspects: Resolving the dispute required simultaneous engagement with judicial authorities and regulatory structures.

Polikarpov Law Firm Strategy

  • Patent analysis: Conducted a detailed review of Ukrainian Patent No. 77306 and its legal protection to establish the fact of infringement.
  • Expert opinions: Engaged certified forensic experts to conduct research that confirmed the active substance of the drug “Dapaglin” violated the patent.
  • Litigation: Presented a substantiated position in court to protect the client’s intellectual property rights.

Lawyers

  • Anton Polikarpov – Managing Partner, attorney, responsible for strategy development and courtroom representation.
  • Vladyslav Zhuravlov – Associate, responsible for preparing procedural documents.

Outcome

On July 11, 2024, the Kyiv Commercial Court ruled in favor of AstraZeneca AB:

  • Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited was prohibited from using the patented invention in the drug “Dapaglin”.
  • The Ministry of Health of Ukraine’s order on the registration of the drug “Dapaglin” was declared invalid, and the registration certificate was annulled.
  • The court confirmed that the active substance of “Dapaglin” violated the client’s intellectual property rights.

This decision safeguarded AstraZeneca’s rights in Ukraine and prevented further use of its invention without permission.

Contact us
We will find the best solution for your business

    Thank you for your request!
    We will contact you within 5 hours!
    Image
    This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

    Privacy settings

    When you visit websites, they may store or retrieve data in your browser. This storage is often required for basic website functionality. Storage may be used for marketing, analytics and site personalization purposes, such as storing your preferences. Privacy is important to us, so you can disable certain types of storage that may not be necessary for the basic functioning of the website. Blocking categories may affect the performance of the website.

    Manage settings


    Necessary

    Always active

    These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be disabled in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions you take that constitute a request for services, such as adjusting your privacy settings, logging in, or filling out forms. You can set your browser to block these cookies or notify you about them, but some parts of the site will not work. These cookies do not store any personal information.

    Marketing

    These elements are used to show you advertising that is more relevant to you and your interests. They can also be used to limit the number of ad views and measure the effectiveness of advertising campaigns. Advertising networks usually place them with the permission of the site operator.

    Personalization

    These elements allow the website to remember your choices (such as your username, language or region you are in) and provide enhanced, more personalized features. For example, a website may provide you with local weather forecasts or traffic news by storing data about your current location.

    Analytics

    These elements help the website operator understand how their website works, how visitors interact with the site and whether there may be technical problems. This type of storage usually does not collect information that identifies the visitor.